Potential Risks of Using AI Tools like ChatGPT in ISO 27001 Compliance: Key Considerations

Analyzing AI tools like ChatGPT in ISO 27001 Compliance

Image from edition.cnn.com

In the ever-evolving world of Artificial Intelligence, ChatGPT stands as a beacon of progress and a topic of heated debate. It’s a brave new world where AI isn’t just a fleeting trend — it’s a transformative force reshaping how we operate.

Proponents of AI, like those championing ChatGPT, view it as a powerhouse tool, capable of turbocharging efficiency in both organizations and individual pursuits. On the flip side, skeptics raise an eyebrow, questioning whether this tech marvel prioritizes quantity over quality — a classic dilemma in the making.

This subject is vast, teeming with diverse opinions and sparking debates that could go on indefinitely.

But let’s zoom in on what really matters to us — the intersection of ChatGPT and compliance, specifically within the realms of ISO 27001. It’s time to dive deep into this facet of AI and unravel what it means for us in the compliance sphere.

ChatGPT and Compliance: Navigating the New Age of AI in the Professional World

When ChatGPT stepped onto the global stage, it sent ripples through the creative industries. From copywriters to graphic designers, from musicians to artists, the creative community found itself at a crossroads.

The looming questions:

Would this AI revolution lead to a drastic reshaping of their professional landscape?

Would their skills become obsolete in the face of advancing technology?

The concern is not unfounded. The rapid advancement of AI technologies like ChatGPT stirs a profound question — are we edging towards an era where human creativity takes a backseat? There’s a real fear that as we lean more on AI, our abilities to think independently, innovate, and create might diminish.

Studies are already hinting at this shift, projecting AI as a catalyst for significant job displacement across various sectors. Hundreds of thousands of jobs, it seems, might be redefined or even rendered redundant by AI’s capabilities.

But let’s shift the lens to a more specific field: compliance, and specifically, the role of compliance officers. Are they too facing a similar existential dilemma? As AI continues to permeate every facet of professional life, understanding its impact on compliance roles becomes crucial.

We’re entering uncharted territory, where balancing human expertise with AI’s efficiency is more critical than ever. Let’s explore this new dynamic and what it means for the future of compliance and those at its helm.

The True Capabilities of ChatGPT in Compliance

Amidst the buzz around ChatGPT’s human-like interactions (complete with its use of ‘me’ and ‘I’), it’s vital to pause and reflect on what AI, at its core, lacks:

• Personal Experiences: AI doesn’t have a life story or personal journey.
• Emotions: AI can’t feel happiness, sadness, or anger.
• Intrinsic Human Memory: AI doesn’t have a reservoir of lived experiences.
• Sympathy and Empathy: AI can’t genuinely share or understand human feelings.

These missing pieces are crucial, especially when pondering over the role of compliance officers. Are they at risk in an AI-dominated world?

Well, before we humorously (or seriously) compare the emotional capabilities of compliance officers to AI, let’s pivot to what truly matters — understanding ChatGPT’s nature and its limitations.

It’s not about whether ChatGPT can empathize like a human (spoiler: it can’t), but about comprehending its design, scope, and boundaries. This understanding is key to discerning the actual impact of AI tools like ChatGPT on the intricate work of compliance.

So, let’s dive into the essence of ChatGPT, peel back the layers of its capabilities, and explore how it fits into the puzzle of compliance, without overstepping the boundaries of its silicon-based heart

Understanding ChatGPT and Its Potentials

ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a sophisticated AI model powered by the Generative Pre-trained Transformer (GPT) technology. It excels in natural language processing tasks such as answering questions, summarizing texts, and writing code.

Its capabilities, enhanced by advanced techniques like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO), allow it to adapt and improve based on user feedback.

ChatGPT’s potential for compliance is significant. It could learn to navigate complex compliance standards, but current AI limitations in contextual understanding pose challenges.

In theory, ChatGPT could assist with tasks like report generation and knowledge assimilation in compliance. The future might see more specialized AI models, like a hypothetical ‘ComplianceGPT’, which could offer customized advice and support to compliance officers, revolutionizing how companies manage regulatory requirements.

The Limitations of ChatGPT

Wokeness and Compliance

OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, recently addressed ChatGPT’s bias issues, highlighting ongoing efforts to enhance AI impartiality. This focus on ‘wokeness’ — a term emphasizing social awareness and unbiasedness in AI — is crucial for companies to maintain a positive public image. However, integrating this ‘wokeness’ into ChatGPT’s potential role in compliance presents unique challenges.

In compliance, objectivity is essential. Human compliance officers, accountable for bias, provide impartial oversight of company policies. This level of accountability is currently lacking in AI tools like ChatGPT. Their effectiveness in compliance roles depends on their ability to remain unbiased and ethically informed. This is not just a technical hurdle but a moral necessity, especially in fields that demand strict impartiality.

As AI evolves, the critical challenge is balancing technological progress with ethical responsibility, ensuring AI tools like ChatGPT can effectively and ethically contribute to compliance roles.

Absence of Common Sense

ChatGPT, representative of AI technology, lacks intrinsic human attributes such as emotions, personal experiences, and a moral compass, limiting its ‘common sense’ understanding. Humans develop reasoning and comprehension skills through personal experiences and learning from others, a process not replicated in AI.

Despite these limitations, ChatGPT has its form of ‘learning’. It processes and generates responses using a vast text-based database, simulating reasoning to an extent. However, this is not learning in the human sense but a form of information processing based on pre-existing data.

Testing ChatGPT with scenarios requiring reasoning and deduction can provide insight into its ability to mimic human-like understanding. This approach helps evaluate whether AI, despite its inherent constraints, can replicate some aspects of common sense reasoning.

A Test of AI’s ‘Common Sense’ Understanding

Evaluating AI’s ‘Common Sense’ in Contextual Scenarios ChatGPT’s response to the question of leaving a laptop open on a desk reveals its ability to provide context-aware advice. It suggests that it’s safe under certain conditions, like a stable desk away from hazards, showing basic reasoning about physical risks. This response goes beyond a simple yes or no, considering various factors affecting the laptop’s safety.

However, ChatGPT’s reasoning is based on its training data, not human-like experiential learning. It simulates understanding but lacks the nuanced common sense humans develop through experiences.

Understanding ChatGPT’s Context-Dependent Responses ChatGPT’s response changes when directed towards specific aspects like compliance. Initially, it focused on practical issues like security and temperature, missing compliance, privacy, and data security aspects. This shows AI’s limitation in grasping broader contexts without explicit prompts.

When guided to consider compliance, ChatGPT’s response becomes more relevant to that context. This underscores the importance of framing questions clearly and providing specific context for AI tools to generate effective responses, particularly in specialized areas like compliance. It also highlights the need for human oversight to direct AI responses accurately.

Difficulty in Understanding Context

A Forbes article points out a key limitation of AI models like ChatGPT: the difficulty in understanding context, particularly in detecting sarcasm and humor. This limitation is significant in the realm of human-AI communication.

ChatGPT, despite its language processing skills, often falls short in grasping the subtleties of human interaction. Human communication is rich with nuances, where the same words can have different meanings depending on context, tone, and intent. Sarcasm and humor are particularly challenging, as they often depend on cultural, situational, and emotional cues.

ChatGPT’s inability to accurately interpret sarcasm or humor can result in responses that are inappropriate or irrelevant. This highlights a notable gap in AI’s communicative capabilities compared to humans. While AI can process language based on data and patterns, understanding the deeper, often implicit aspects of human communication remains a complex challenge. The article emphasizes the need for further development in AI’s capacity to understand and respond to the complexities of human language in various contexts.

Dependent on Data

The essential role of human input in training AI algorithms is clearly depicted in the diagram from Cloud Factory’s article, “The Essential Guide to Quality Training Data for Machine Learning”. This illustration underscores a fundamental principle in AI development: the quality of AI output is deeply dependent on the quality of the human input it receives during training -

1. Dependence on Accurate Human Input: AI algorithms, like those in ChatGPT, rely heavily on the accuracy and quality of the data they are trained on. This data is often curated, labeled, and input by humans. The AI’s ability to predict outcomes, understand context, and provide relevant responses is intrinsically tied to how well this human-supplied data represents the real world.
2. Necessity of Human Involvement: The training process for AI is not autonomous. It requires continuous human interaction and intervention. This involvement ranges from data selection and cleaning to model tuning and testing. The AI, at every step, is shaped and guided by human decisions and insights.
3. Garbage In, Garbage Out: This old adage holds particularly true for AI. If the training data is flawed — be it inaccurate, biased, or of poor quality — the AI’s outputs will reflect these flaws. The laptop example previously discussed illustrates this principle. The AI’s response was limited to the scope and quality of the information it was trained on, lacking in areas where its training data did not adequately cover or where the query did not specifically prompt those considerations.

Limited Domain Knowledge

The concept of domain knowledge, or expertise in a specific area within an industry, presents a significant challenge for AI tools like ChatGPT. While ChatGPT has a broad base of general knowledge, it lacks deep expertise in any particular field. This limitation becomes especially evident in specialized areas such as compliance within specific domains.

For ChatGPT to be effectively applied in such specialized areas, it would need to be trained with specific information about the user’s industry, organization, or context. This training process is not just about feeding data into the system; it involves curating and structuring the data in a way that the AI can understand and utilize effectively. This requires significant human input and expertise.

However, there’s a catch-22 here. The process of training ChatGPT to develop sufficient domain knowledge for specialized tasks like compliance can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. This somewhat contradicts the initial goal of employing AI for increased efficiency and speed in implementing compliance frameworks.

It’s a delicate balance: on one hand, AI can automate and streamline certain aspects of compliance, potentially saving time and resources in the long run. On the other hand, the upfront investment in terms of time and effort to train the AI to a level where it can function effectively in a specialized domain can be considerable.

Why ChatGPT Isn’t Ideal for Compliance Roles

ChatGPT, while technologically advanced, falls short in critical areas essential for compliance, especially in organizations preparing for ISO 27001 audits:

1. Risk of Inaccurate Information: ChatGPT is known for generating plausible yet sometimes incorrect responses. In compliance, where accuracy is crucial, such misinformation can lead to non-compliance and serious legal or financial consequences.
2. Verbosity Issue: ChatGPT tends to produce verbose content. Compliance tasks require clear, concise communication, and excessive verbosity can hide important details, leading to regulatory misunderstandings.
3. Lack of Tailored Expertise: Compliance needs vary significantly across organizations, especially in the tech sector. ChatGPT lacks the specialized, tailored expertise necessary for each unique case, making it less effective for nuanced compliance guidance.
4. Absence of Human Judgment and Accountability: Compliance often involves ethical decisions and accountability, attributes beyond AI’s current capabilities. Unlike human officers, ChatGPT cannot be held accountable for its advice or decisions, a critical factor in compliance roles.

How Could You Boost Your Compliance Journey with ChatGPT ?

Are you tired of sifting through endless documents and guidelines to ensure your organization’s compliance with ISO 27001? Enter ChatGPT, your new secret weapon for a seamless compliance journey!

While ChatGPT can provide you with the basics of ISO 27001 compliance, it can’t create customized content tailored to your organization’s unique needs. That’s where the magic happens! With our expertise, we can help you craft a compliance strategy that’s as unique as your organization.

But, here’s the thing: ChatGPT is not a magic wand that will grant you compliance overnight. It’s important to remember that the results of using AI for compliance can be, well, let’s just say “interesting.” Law professor Matthew Sag of Emory University puts it best: “There’s a saying that an infinite number of monkeys will eventually give you Shakespeare.” So, be prepared for some unexpected results!

That’s why we recommend double-checking the content created by ChatGPT to ensure it meets your organization’s specific needs. After all, compliance is no laughing matter!

So, are you ready to take your compliance journey to the next level with ChatGPT? Let’s get started today and make your compliance journey a breeze!

Is ChatGPT Compliance the Future of Compliance? Potentially.

Currently, you have the option to utilize ChatGPT as a means to develop a standard roadmap for your ISO 27001 journey. However, it’s worth noting that there already exists a reputable and reliable tool, along with comprehensive instructions, in the realm of lean compliance. This tool has been meticulously crafted and fine-tuned by seasoned experts in the field.

Ready to Streamline Compliance?

Building a secure foundation for your startup is crucial, but navigating the complexities of achieving compliance can be a hassle, especially for a small team.

SecureSlate offers a simpler solution:

• Affordable: Expensive compliance software shouldn’t be the barrier. Our affordable plans start at just $99/month.
• Focus on Your Business, Not Paperwork: Automate tedious tasks and free up your team to focus on innovation and growth.
• Gain Confidence and Credibility: Our platform guides you through the process, ensuring you meet all essential requirements, giving you peace of mind.

Get Started in Just 3 Minutes

It only takes 3 minutes to sign up and see how our platform can streamline your compliance journey.